![]() ![]() First I thought it could be an issue with Photomechanic (where I am applying the kw) but I checked the raw files in another software (DXO PhotoLab 4) and the keywords are there. ![]() If I check them in Mac Finder, I cannot see the keywords, like I do with jpgs and tifs. But all raws are stucked in the original folder, like they wouldn t have the keywords attached. Hazel is applying well the rules (rename and move to subfolder) only for jpgs and tifs. Imagine that I have a batch of files (al types: jpgs, tifs and raws) and all of them are keyworded with the same hierarchical path of keywords. But I encountered another problem: I have one folder where there are all sorts of image files: mainly jpgs and tifs, and raw files as well.( arw, cr2 and nefs). Thank you, meanwhile I succeded to modify the date of the photos acordingly, so I use the data field instead of headline. Can I get rid of it? thank you, my bests, Sorin Sorin Posts: 5 Joined: Mon 2:57 pm Neutrasomni_2018?_139x147_cm_oil on_canvas.jpg or 2018?_WRK my first question is if there is proper field to put the year of completion(it is often different from the year the photo was taken) the second one is related to the HEADLINE question mark outcome. move it to subfolder WORKS > WRK > everything works well, except when the HEADLINE field is read, the output is with aquestion mark at the end. reading keywords and fields(description and headline) I do this: 1. And also I didn’t put the year as keyword, to simplify the hierarchies. I am not able to freely edit a Date field, so I came with this solution. for whatever reason, on Headline field I am putting the YEAR the work was completed. I edit Description field with the ARTWORK NAME 4. I also append a second one size >200 > 300 3. for example: A.Photomechanic 1.first set: artwork > painting > oil on/acrilyc on/ etc. Basically, I have a bunch of images that I’m tagging with hierarchical keywords in Photomechanic 6. I am an artist and I want to organise my archive files. Maybe you can help me, but first of all, i would describe you my workflow. Hi there, meanwhile I succeded to work quite well with Hazel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |